Michael Hyatt, CEO and Prez at Thomas Nelson responds to the PW article I mentioned earlier.
Link: From Where I Sit: Editorial Standards: A Time for Clarity.
Last week, Publishers Weekly ran an article about our new editorial standards. The article asserted that “future contracts will require authors—even those writing in non-religion categories like business—to signal their agreement with both the Nicene Creed ... and Philippians 4:8.”
So, let me see if I understand his position:
1. It is preposterous to believe that Thomas Nelson would require their authors to adhere to the Nicene Creed or Philippians 4:8
2. But as a company they adhere to those standards
3. And they "align themselves with (translation: publish) people who share our vision, mission and values." Oh yeah, and they can prove it is important not to publish those they don't agree with through the use of an obscure Old Testament reference.
4. And, as long as you meet "these standards," you have tremendous latitude to produce something for Thomas Nelson ... as long as it is in keeping with Philippians 4:8
Did I miss something?
Posted by: Will | December 11, 2006 at 02:38 PM
For clarification, I am not suggesting that Thomas Nelson doesn't have complete latitude; they are a private company and can publish whatever they wish. My comment above was only to point out the bizarre, Orwellian manner with which Michael Hyatt answered the question.
Posted by: Will | December 11, 2006 at 02:54 PM
My favorite part is that all these "articles" emerged because of a Nelson press release announcing essentially what the release reported.
It's like Charles Barkley arguing that he was misquoted in his own autobiography.
Posted by: Dave L | December 12, 2006 at 10:33 AM